EVE Search - Shiva: Agents'n'Dungeons

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 12 post(s)
JP Beauregard	Posted - 2004.10.13 07:14:00 - [1] Originally by: S'Daria Any new content is good. But please don't call them Dungeons... Complexes, complexes, complexes!!! Actually, and even though "complex" appears to be a countable noun, the plural "complexes" sounds rather offensive to the latent Latin undercurrent of my consciousness. Although it's of course a fun word to say with a Gollum accent. Can we maybe try the military synonym "installations" given that there is a combat element involved? JP Beauregard === The Pilkington Guides to EVE ===
JP Beauregard	Posted - 2004.10.13 07:14:00 - [2] Originally by: S'Daria Any new content is good. But please don't call them Dungeons... Complexes, complexes, complexes!!! Actually, and even though "complex" appears to be a countable noun, the plural "complexes" sounds rather offensive to the latent Latin undercurrent of my consciousness. Although it's of course a fun word to say with a Gollum accent. Can we maybe try the military synonym "installations" given that there is a combat element involved? JP Beauregard === The Pilkington Guides to EVE ===
JP Beauregard Gallente Pilkington Communications	Posted - 2004.10.13 07:14:00 - [3] Originally by: S'Daria Any new content is good. But please don't call them Dungeons... Complexes, complexes, complexes!!! Actually, and even though "complex" appears to be a countable noun, the plural "complexes" sounds rather offensive to the latent Latin undercurrent of my consciousness. Although it's of course a fun word to say with a Gollum accent. Can we maybe try the military synonym "installations" given that there is a combat element involved? ** PILCO - We Service Brains of All Sizes **
JP Beauregard	Posted - 2004.10.17 21:41:00 - [4] Originally by: Papa Smurf Btw. seems like the marketing term for them is "Deadspace Complexes". Then someone in Marketing must be after a comedy prize.
JP Beauregard	Posted - 2004.10.17 21:41:00 - [5] Originally by: Papa Smurf Btw. seems like the marketing term for them is "Deadspace Complexes". Then someone in Marketing must be after a comedy prize.
JP Beauregard Gallente Pilkington Communications	Posted - 2004.10.17 21:41:00 - [6] Originally by: Papa Smurf Btw. seems like the marketing term for them is "Deadspace Complexes". Then someone in Marketing must be after a comedy prize.
JP Beauregard	Posted - 2004.10.19 17:28:00 - [7] Originally by: Papa Smurf There will indeed be monsters. Monsters in EVE terms are just NPC ships. Treasure chests in EVE terms are various spawn containers, flotsam, etc. How about virgins and maidens? I mean, if there be dragons
JP Beauregard	Posted - 2004.10.19 17:28:00 - [8] Originally by: Papa Smurf There will indeed be monsters. Monsters in EVE terms are just NPC ships. Treasure chests in EVE terms are various spawn containers, flotsam, etc. How about virgins and maidens? I mean, if there be dragons
JP Beauregard Gallente Pilkington Communications	Posted - 2004.10.19 17:28:00 - [9] Originally by: Papa Smurf There will indeed be monsters. Monsters in EVE terms are just NPC ships. Treasure chests in EVE terms are various spawn containers, flotsam, etc. How about virgins and maidens? I mean, if there be dragons
JP Beauregard	Posted - 2004.10.26 08:14:00 - [10] Originally by: S'Daria There's no point for them to implement something that we don't want. There is no point to asking what "we" want because "we" are a small (though in part annoyingly noisy and meddlesome) minority that is in no way representative of the game's audience. And there is no point to detailing every aspect of a game system, especially on the content side. I'm all for explaining the framework of a game system and the functionality of individual elements. But that's a long way from pre-digesting and regurgitating every minute detail to the point of making discovery impossible. There is a reason why you won't see walkthroughs for MMOGs... JP Beauregard === The Pilkington Guides to EVE ===
JP Beauregard	Posted - 2004.10.26 08:14:00 - [11] Originally by: S'Daria There's no point for them to implement something that we don't want. There is no point to asking what "we" want because "we" are a small (though in part annoyingly noisy and meddlesome) minority that is in no way representative of the game's audience. And there is no point to detailing every aspect of a game system, especially on the content side. I'm all for explaining the framework of a game system and the functionality of individual elements. But that's a long way from pre-digesting and regurgitating every minute detail to the point of making discovery impossible. There is a reason why you won't see walkthroughs for MMOGs... JP Beauregard === The Pilkington Guides to EVE ===
JP Beauregard Gallente Pilkington Communications	Posted - 2004.10.26 08:14:00 - [12] Originally by: S'Daria There's no point for them to implement something that we don't want. There is no point to asking what "we" want because "we" are a small (though in part annoyingly noisy and meddlesome) minority that is in no way representative of the game's audience. And there is no point to detailing every aspect of a game system, especially on the content side. I'm all for explaining the framework of a game system and the functionality of individual elements. But that's a long way from pre-digesting and regurgitating every minute detail to the point of making discovery impossible. There is a reason why you won't see walkthroughs for MMOGs... ** PILCO - We Service Brains of All Sizes **
JP Beauregard	Posted - 2004.10.29 07:35:00 - [13] Edited by: JP Beauregard on 29/10/2004 07:37:55 Originally by: Thaylor Didn't you said rats cheat? I mean although rats have finite cap, their modules still work when you use a Nosferatu on them. They can use their MWD or AB continuously. They have infinite ammo. How is this a fair fight? Let's see. You get the tactical advantage of knowing their position and have the first move. You can adapt while the AI is set and permanently locked to "stupid". How again is your advantage not unfair? Really, I want these mission rats to have a surrender option. As soon as they know I'll be coming after them, they should have an envoy contact the station and offer to self-destruct and spare me the trouble of undocking... JP Beauregard === The Pilkington Guides to EVE ===
JP Beauregard	Posted - 2004.10.29 07:35:00 - [14] Edited by: JP Beauregard on 29/10/2004 07:37:55 Originally by: Thaylor Didn't you said rats cheat? I mean although rats have finite cap, their modules still work when you use a Nosferatu on them. They can use their MWD or AB continuously. They have infinite ammo. How is this a fair fight? Let's see. You get the tactical advantage of knowing their position and have the first move. You can adapt while the AI is set and permanently locked to "stupid". How again is your advantage not unfair? Really, I want these mission rats to have a surrender option. As soon as they know I'll be coming after them, they should have an envoy contact the station and offer to self-destruct and spare me the trouble of undocking... JP Beauregard === The Pilkington Guides to EVE ===
JP Beauregard Gallente Pilkington Communications	Posted - 2004.10.29 07:35:00 - [15] Edited by: JP Beauregard on 29/10/2004 07:37:55 Originally by: Thaylor Didn't you said rats cheat? I mean although rats have finite cap, their modules still work when you use a Nosferatu on them. They can use their MWD or AB continuously. They have infinite ammo. How is this a fair fight? Let's see. You get the tactical advantage of knowing their position and have the first move. You can adapt while the AI is set and permanently locked to "stupid". How again is your advantage not unfair? Really, I want these mission rats to have a surrender option. As soon as they know I'll be coming after them, they should have an envoy contact the station and offer to self-destruct and spare me the trouble of undocking... ** PILCO - We Service Brains of All Sizes **

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.